← All entries

Cellobiose vs glucose comparison — CxnA and beta-glucosidase strains

Wet lab Both projects Confirmed

Contributors: Tank, Chester

Repeated the growth-condition setup from 11–12 August (culture 3’s recipe), but substituting cellobiose for glucose in half the cultures, and comparing TOP10+beta-glucosidase against TOP10+CxnA rather than testing a single strain.

Supplement changes based on the 11–12 August results: FeSO₄ and thiamine were dropped (conditions 5 and 6 showed no significant importance for growth). Casamino acids were kept — condition 7 (no casamino acids) showed near-zero growth, confirming it’s essential.

#ConditionPurpose
1M9 + glucose, full supplement (no FeSO₄/thiamine)Main experiment
2M9 + cellobiose, full supplement (no FeSO₄/thiamine)Main experiment

Chloramphenicol at 40 µg/mL, IPTG at 0.38 mg/mL throughout. Cells were washed into M9 salts using the same protocol as 11 August (OD600 of washed suspension = 2.5; inoculum V = 1000 × target-OD ÷ OD600 for 20 mL at starting OD 0.05 ≈ 400 µl).

Eight 24 h cultures set up (duplicate a/b for each strain × carbon-source combination):

  • 1a/1b — glucose + beta-glucosidase
  • 2a/2b — glucose + CxnA
  • 3a/3b — cellobiose + CxnA
  • 4a/4b — cellobiose + beta-glucosidase

No intermediate growth curve was taken this round due to time constraints — cultures were simply grown for 24 h and read the next day.