← All entries

M9 growth-curve screen repeated for consistency

Wet lab Both projects Confirmed

Contributors: Tank, Chester

Repeated the 11 August growth-curve experiment (same 7 conditions) to check reproducibility, with an extra day-2 reading.

Culture0h2h4h5h6h7h8hDay 2 (12:45)Max OD600
10.0530.5801.4001.9302.1902.4002.7302.2502.730
20.0980.6201.2801.6801.7701.8201.7501.7301.820
30.0220.2210.8501.5302.2201.8501.8501.5702.220
40.0240.0630.0800.1400.2200.2500.3100.3000.310
50.0330.2100.7901.6002.3902.0402.0001.7002.390
60.0490.3300.8301.5201.8401.8501.8501.6401.850
70.0520.0700.1300.1500.1000.0800.0700.0800.150

Broadly reproduces the 11 August pattern: the no-carbon-source control (4) and the no-casamino-acids condition (7) both stayed near baseline, while the other conditions grew substantially. Culture 2 gave an unreasonable result relative to its expected role as the no-supplement negative control — likely a culture-preparation error rather than a genuine growth signal.

Separately, started overnight cultures of CxnA and beta-glucosidase in LB + 0.38 mg/mL IPTG + 40 µg/mL chloramphenicol, for the cellobiose-substitution experiment planned next.